<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choose Drupal, Not Proprietary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/web-applications/choose-drupal-not-proprietary.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/web-applications/choose-drupal-not-proprietary.htm</link>
	<description>Inclind, Inc - Delaware Web Designers - Professional Delaware Web Design Since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Quillen</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/web-applications/choose-drupal-not-proprietary.htm/comment-page-1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Quillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/?p=463#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Sure do sir. We talked about those as well. At the time we had looked at both Railo and SmithProject - our biggest question was would they still be around after a year or two? I realize the same question can be applied to Drupal, but they appear to have the strongest community. It looks like SP hasn&#039;t been updated in quite some time, but Railo seems to be pretty consistent. I believe we even tried Railo for a month, but there was still a need to reduce the time it took to build applications and we thought it would be best to move away from CFML. I still like the language.

We also came close to starting over with Ruby on Rails or something like CakePHP/Zend. In the end, we figured we&#039;d simply be rebuilding whats already built (theoretically), and starting with Drupal was a good launching point into providing the base CMS and adding custom application on top of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure do sir. We talked about those as well. At the time we had looked at both Railo and SmithProject &#8211; our biggest question was would they still be around after a year or two? I realize the same question can be applied to Drupal, but they appear to have the strongest community. It looks like SP hasn&#8217;t been updated in quite some time, but Railo seems to be pretty consistent. I believe we even tried Railo for a month, but there was still a need to reduce the time it took to build applications and we thought it would be best to move away from CFML. I still like the language.</p>
<p>We also came close to starting over with Ruby on Rails or something like CakePHP/Zend. In the end, we figured we&#8217;d simply be rebuilding whats already built (theoretically), and starting with Drupal was a good launching point into providing the base CMS and adding custom application on top of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Meloche</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/web-applications/choose-drupal-not-proprietary.htm/comment-page-1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Meloche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarewebdesigner.com/?p=463#comment-350</guid>
		<description>You do realize that you had other CFML alternatives? Both Railo - getrailo.org - and Open BlueDragon - openbluedragon.org - are open source CFML engines. Both have been around as proprietary engines for several years before going open source last year. Add to that, Mura CMS - getmura.com - is an open source CMS written in CFML that&#039;s as good as any PHP based CMS if not better.

It boggles my mind how many people decide to move away from CFML, not knowing they don&#039;t have to. The proprietary argument is no longer applicable to CFML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize that you had other CFML alternatives? Both Railo &#8211; getrailo.org &#8211; and Open BlueDragon &#8211; openbluedragon.org &#8211; are open source CFML engines. Both have been around as proprietary engines for several years before going open source last year. Add to that, Mura CMS &#8211; getmura.com &#8211; is an open source CMS written in CFML that&#8217;s as good as any PHP based CMS if not better.</p>
<p>It boggles my mind how many people decide to move away from CFML, not knowing they don&#8217;t have to. The proprietary argument is no longer applicable to CFML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
